Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01388
Original file (PD2012 01388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1201388
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130910
SEPARATION DATE: 20030113


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (63Y/Track Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition. He experienced back pain early in service that was subsequently diagnosed as non-surgical disc disease. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty, so he was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded “chronic back pain…” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and referencing Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “The condition has become increasingly worse causing many other medical problems relating to my back and head.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. The contended headache condition and any other “medical problems” alluded to in the application were not identified by either the MEB or PEB and are therefore not in the purview of this Board. Those, or any conditions or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB – Dated 20021025
 VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain…
 5299-5295 10% Herniated Nucleus Pulposis L5-S1 5293-5295 10% 20021107
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Headaches 8100 0%
Chronic Neck Pain 5299-5290 NSC
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20021204 .



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Lumbar Spine Condition. The earliest entry in the service treatment record (STR) for back pain was in August 2000, precipitated by unit training. There are repeated STR entries for the complaint afterwards, documenting persistence in spite of conservative treatment measures. Plain X-rays demonstrated scoliosis without further abnormality the former a probable contributor to the symptoms. The CI reported pain radiation and intermittent paresthesias of the left leg in 2002, and magnetic resonance imaging of July 2002 noted central disc protrusion at L5/SI without neural encroachment. The orthopedic consultant did not recommend surgery and a temporary L3 profile was issued in September 2000. Failing significant response to various conservative modalities, an MEB was initiated. Various STR entries document normal gait, grossly (and measured) normal range-of-motion (ROM) and normal neurological findings. There is no STR evidence for any incapacitating episodes. The narrative summary noted chronic back pain rated 7 out of 10, interfering with running, bending, squatting and heavy lifting. The physical exam noted lumbar tenderness, but “full active range of motion,” with 5/5 strength and otherwise normal neurologic findings. At the VA Compensation and Pension evaluation (2 months prior to separation), the examiner noted “daily pain at 4/10 with a flare up to 8/10,” and recorded left sciatic radicular pain and intermittent paresthesias. Limitations were not specified, noting that the CI was able to “work in his job” under a profile. The VA physical exam noted a normal gait, paraspinal tenderness and normal neurological findings. The ROM was characterized as “full active/passive,” but specified painful motion.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The 2003 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which must be applied to the Board’s recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, differ significantly from the current §4.71a general rating formula for the spine. The applicable coding options for this case are excerpted below.
5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar
Severe ...................................................................................................................................... 40        
Moderate ................................................................................................................................. 20   
Slight ........................................................................................................................................ 10
5293 Intervertebral disc syndrome:
…
With incapacitating episodes having a total duration of at least one week but less
than two weeks during the past 12 months ...............................................................................10

5295 Lumbosacral strain:
Severe; with listing of whole' spine to opposite side, positive Goldthwaite's sign,
marked limitation of forward bending in standing position, loss of lateral motion
with osteo-arthritic changes, or narrowing or irregularity of joint space, or some
of the above with abnormal mobility on forced motion ...................................................... 40
With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral,
        in standing' position ............................................................................................................. 20
With characteristic pain on motion ......................................................................................... 10
The PEB and VA both conferred a 10% rating under 5295 and the single criterion for that rating was supported by the evidence. The criteria for the higher ratings were not in evidence. In light of the normal ROM evidence from the Service and VA evaluations no rating greater than 10% can be supported under the alternate code 5292. There was no evidence for incapacitating episodes that would support a compensable rating under 5293. The Board further considered whether the associated radiculopathy warranted an additional Service disability rating but members agreed that the requisite link of the neuropathy with functional impairment was not in evidence. It is also noted that the VA considered separate rating for the neuropathy, pursuing this with an electrophysiologic study. The VA did not find support for a compensable rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication of the lumbar spine condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As noted above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40 for its rating was possibly operant in this case; and the lumbar condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by the Board. In the matter of the lumbar spine condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board's scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Back Pain without Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120705, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXX ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20130021919 (PD201201388)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01074

    Original file (PD2011-01074.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Medical Records. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: VASRD CODE RATING 5293-5295 COMBINED 20% 20% Chronic LBP...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01409

    Original file (PD 2012 01409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the chronic mechanical LBP 10% under the VASRD code for lumbar strain in effect at the time citing characteristic pain on motion without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms on repeated examinations. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01477

    Original file (PD-2012-01477.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre‐Separation) Effective Date 20020205 Exam Code 5293 Rating 10%* Rating 10% Condition Intervertebral Disc Syndrome 0% 2 # / Not Service‐Connected x 4 Combined: 10% 20011106 20011106 ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain Condition. The Board considered the 20% rating however there was no evidence of muscle spasm on forward bending or unilateral loss of lateral motion on either the MEB examinations or the C&P examination to support the 20% rating. Service Treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020

    Original file (PD-2012-01020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01023

    Original file (PD 2012 01023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201023 SEPARATION DATE: 20020814 BOARD DATE: 20130124 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (13B/Canon Crewmember), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) secondary to spondylolysis at L-3 without neurologic abnormality. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00239

    Original file (PD2012-00239.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases; in this case, chronic mechanical low back pain. The PEB disability description was “chronic mechanical low back pain due to lumbar DDD, without neurologic abnormality or documented...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01753

    Original file (PD2012 01753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar In the matter of bilateral lower extremity radiculopathies associated with the unfitting lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend additional ratings for peripheral nerve impairment.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00540

    Original file (PD2012-00540.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 2003 Veteran Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed to the current §4.71a rating standards in 2004, and were identical to the 2003 VASRD standards used by the VA in its initial rating decision. Board members agreed that elements of the 20% rating were not present on any of the cited examinations and further noted that there was no evidence of “incapacitating episodes”...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00696

    Original file (PD-2013-00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic neck and lumbar pain conditions, characterized as “cervical spine pain and lumbar spine pain” and “mild degenerative disk disease (DDD), cervical spine,” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic neck pain,” and “chronic lumbar pain”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% respectively, with likely application ofthe Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was...